When people talk about great UX, they mention sleek onboarding flows, frictionless checkout experiences, and beautifully animated dashboards. But almost nobody talks about the settings page.

And that’s exactly why it’s a mess.

Utility pages—settings, notifications, account management—live in the dark corners of a product. They’re rarely the star of a demo, almost never A/B tested, and often treated as a dumping ground for whatever doesn’t fit elsewhere. The result? A UX graveyard, full of neglected, confusing, and intentionally frustrating experiences.

And sometimes, it’s not just neglect. It’s strategy.


How Settings Become a UX Nightmare

Settings pages are where the product stops selling you and starts serving you. Or at least, that’s what they should be. But in reality, they’re often where UX quality drops off a cliff.

Why? Because settings, by definition, are where users take control—and not every company wants that.

When settings are designed well, they empower users. When they’re designed badly, they keep users trapped. And let’s be honest: plenty of companies don’t want you unsubscribing, turning off notifications, or reducing their access to your data.

Take a close look at your favorite SaaS tool. I bet the homepage is polished to perfection. The sign-up process? Seamless. But the moment you try to find the unsubscribe button, turn off aggressive notifications, or change your email preferences, suddenly the UI feels like it was built in 2008 by a disinterested intern.

This is not an accident.


The Dark Patterns of Utility Pages

Bad settings UX comes in two flavors: passive neglect and active obstruction.

1. Passive Neglect: The Settings Nobody Cares About

Some settings pages are bad simply because nobody prioritizes them. They don’t drive signups, they don’t generate revenue, and they don’t get love from the design team.

Common symptoms:

Cluttered menus with no clear structure.

Unlabeled toggles where you’re never sure if “on” means enabled or disabled.

Buried options that require five clicks just to change a basic setting.

Confusing language (“Deactivate” vs. “Disable” vs. “Turn Off”).

This kind of bad UX isn’t malicious—it’s just lazy. But lazy design is still a problem because every bad experience erodes trust.

2. Active Obstruction: The UX Booby Traps

Then there’s the intentional stuff. The settings pages that are bad on purpose.

You’ve seen them before:

The Unsubscribe Maze: Where canceling a subscription requires multiple confirmation screens, misleading buttons, and a CAPTCHA that makes you doubt your own existence.

The Notification Trap: Where turning off email alerts is easy, but push notifications require navigating seven different pages and a blood pact.

The Data Collection Wall: Where deleting your account means writing an email to support, waiting three days, and answering a survey about your “user experience.”

This isn’t just poor design—it’s deliberate friction, designed to make leaving as painful as possible.

And it works. Studies have shown that even minor inconveniences drastically reduce user actions. A 2021 study in the Journal of Behavioral Economics found that adding just two extra clicks to an unsubscribe process cut opt-out rates by 47%.

Companies know this. And they exploit it.


Why This Matters for SaaS Founders

If you’re building a SaaS product, you might think: “Well, everyone else does it, so should I?”

Let me be blunt: this is a terrible idea.

Dark patterns might keep users from unsubscribing today, but they destroy goodwill long-term. The second a better alternative appears, frustrated users will leave—and they won’t just leave quietly. They’ll post about it. They’ll leave bad reviews. They’ll call you out on social media.

And if you think regulators aren’t watching, think again. The FTC has started cracking down on deceptive UX practices, and the EU’s GDPR mandates clear, accessible user controls. Companies like Amazon and Google have already been fined for manipulative design tactics.

So, what’s the alternative?


How to Fix Utility Pages (And Not Be Evil)

If you want to build long-term trust, your settings and utility pages need the same level of UX care as your homepage. Here’s how:

1. Design for Clarity, Not Confusion

• Use plain language. No “Manage Preferences” when you mean “Turn Off Notifications.”

• Make toggles and buttons unambiguous. “On” and “Off” should be crystal clear.

• Group related settings logically—users shouldn’t need a scavenger hunt to find basic controls.

2. Make Opt-Outs Simple and Honest

• If someone wants to unsubscribe, let them. No guilt trips, no hidden menus, no re-authentication just to leave.

• Provide one-click notification management instead of forcing users to navigate multiple screens.

• Offer clear explanations: instead of tricking users with “Are you sure you don’t want to receive exclusive offers?” just say, “Turn off marketing emails.”

3. Respect User Control

• Allow users to delete their accounts easily without jumping through hoops.

• Give full transparency on data collection, and let users manage permissions without resistance.

• Provide instant confirmation for changes—don’t make users “wait 24 hours” just to update an email setting.


At the end of the day, bad settings UX is a choice. Some companies neglect it. Others weaponize it. But the companies that truly win in the long run are the ones that respect their users’ time and intelligence.

Because when users trust your product, they stay—not because they’re trapped, but because they actually want to.

And that’s the kind of loyalty no dark pattern can manufacture.